WEB RUBRIC for INTERNATIONAL PROJECT
Excellent Good Passing
|
Content Writing |
Subject Matter |
Information
interesting and accurate All
sources are written in the bibliography It
is written in my own words with
original ideas (10) |
Information
is clear. All
sources are written in the bibliography . Mainly
written
in own words with original ideas. (7) |
Information
could be arranged better. Sources
are given credit. Own
ideas are expressed. (5) |
|
Drafting |
All grammar,
spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected (10) |
Most
grammar, spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected (7) |
Some grammar,
spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected. (5) |
|
|
Comprehension |
Material shows a clear understanding Students show critical thinking Interview questions and answers are accurately written and to the point (10) |
Material
shows understanding Interview
questions and
answers are understandable and mostly accurate (7) |
Material shows some understanding Interview questions and answers are difficult to
understand and (5) |
|
|
Content technical |
Co - Herence |
The
information is coherent – written in logical order using connectors
where necessary (10) |
Information
is written in logical order using very few connectors (7) |
Difficult
to follow the logical order of the text and uses no connectors (5) |
|
Look |
Has
an overall graphic theme. It appeals to the audience and complements the
information. (10) |
It
appeals graphically and complements the information (7) |
It
is visually neat. (5) |
|
|
Size |
All
assignment tasks were completed and there are at least 3 links. (10) |
Most
assignment tasks were completed and there at least 2 links (7) |
Very
few assignment tasks were completed and there are 1 or no links (5) |
|
|
Communication |
Links |
All
links work. (10) |
Most
links work. Navigation is fine. (7) |
Some
links work. It
is hard to go back and forth on the site. (5) |
|
Feedback |
Students accept the
constructive criticism given by fellow students (10) |
Students check
for students' responses and fix some errors. (7) |
Students
have not checked for constructive criticism nor made any necessary
corrections (5) |
|
|
Collaboration |
Students work as
an effective team. Division of labor
is based on each one's talents. The final product
was the full team's creation and couldn't be done alone. Students show
respect to teachers and peers. Students worked
during their own free time to communicate with the Canadian school. (20) |
Students work as
a team. Most members fill their responsibilities. Disagreements were
resolved. (15) |
Site is a result
of only some group effort. There is evidence
of poor communication. There is
unresolved conflict and no collaboration. (10) |