WEB RUBRIC for INTERNATIONAL PROJECT

 

                              Excellent                             Good                  Passing

Content Writing

Subject Matter

Information interesting and accurate

All sources are written in the bibliography

It is written in my own words  with original ideas

(10)

Information is clear.

All sources are written in the bibliography .

Mainly  written in own words with original ideas.

(7)

Information could be arranged better.

Sources are given credit.

Own ideas are expressed.

 

(5)

Drafting

All grammar, spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected                      (10)

Most grammar, spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected

(7)

Some grammar, spelling and technical mistakes have been corrected. (5)

Comprehension

Material shows a clear understanding

Students show critical thinking

 

Interview questions and         answers are accurately written and to the point

 

(10)

Material shows understanding

Interview questions

and answers are understandable and mostly accurate

(7)

Material shows some understanding

Interview questions and answers are difficult to understand and

 

(5)

Content technical

Co -

Herence

The information is coherent – written in logical order using connectors where necessary

 

(10)

Information is written in logical order using very few connectors

(7)

Difficult to follow the logical order of the text and uses no connectors

 

(5)

Look

Has an overall graphic theme. It appeals to the audience and complements the information.

(10)

It appeals graphically and complements the information

(7)

It is visually neat.

 

 

(5)

Size

All assignment tasks were completed and there are at least 3 links.

(10)

Most assignment tasks were completed and there at least 2 links

(7)

Very few assignment tasks were completed and there are 1 or no links

(5)

Communication

Links

All links work.

 

(10)

Most links work. Navigation is fine.

(7)

Some links work.

It is hard to go back and forth on the site.

(5)

Feedback

Students accept the constructive criticism given by fellow students

(10)

Students check for students' responses and fix some errors.

 

(7)

Students have not checked for constructive criticism nor made any necessary corrections

(5)

Collaboration

Students work as an effective team.

Division of labor is based on each one's talents.

The final product was the full team's creation and couldn't be done alone.

Students show respect to teachers and peers.

Students worked during their own free time to communicate with the Canadian school.

(20)

Students work as a team. Most members fill their responsibilities.

Disagreements were resolved.

 

(15)

Site is a result of only some group effort.

There is evidence of poor communication.

There is unresolved conflict and no collaboration.

(10)